A Sweet Baltimore Discovery at Johns Hopkins University (1879)

  In 1877, the H.W. Perot Import Firm, largest supplier of sugar in Baltimore at the time, had a large shipment impounded by the U.S. Government, which questioned its purity. The company hired Constantin Fahlberg (born in Tambov, Russia in 1850), an expert on sugar, to run tests and requested Johns Hopkins University Professor Ira Remsen (born in Harlem, NY in 1846) for use of the chemistry lab he managed.  H.W. Perot also hired Remsen, asking him to provide a laboratory for Fahlberg’s tests.

Constantin Fahlberg

  Dr. Ira Remsen founded the nation’s first journal of chemical research, and is considered the father of American chemistry. According to the book, "Sweet and low: A Family Story” by Rich Cohen, he had began tinkering with sulfobenzoic acids as a student in Germany eventually publishing 75 papers on these and related compounds, work that would be the research basis for what was to come – “saccharin”.

Ira Remsen,
Johns Hopkins Professor
and President

  In 1878, he became the second president of Johns Hopkins University and was less directly involved with the lab.  One day in June 1878, Professor Remsen suggested to his colleague, Fahlberg, that he experiment on testing substitution products of coal tar.  He had become so intensely interested and eventually forgot about supper until it was quite late, and then rushed off for a meal without stopping to wash his hands.

  Fahlberg sat down to dinner, picked up a roll with his hand and bit into a remarkably sweet crust – the result of having spilled an experimental compound over his hands from earlier that day. Realizing that it had to have come from the laboratory, according to his statement in a Baltimore Sun article he rushed back to it and “proceeded to taste the contents of every beaker and evaporating dish on the lab table.  Luckily for me, none contained any corrosive or poisonous liquid.”  Finally, he found the source:  an overboiled beaker in which sulfobenzoic acid had reacted to ultimately produce benzoic sulfinide which, to the taste, outsugared sugar.

Seal of the Fahlberg, List & Co.

  Remsen and Fahlberg jointly published an article describing the method of saccharin synthesis in February 1879, though initially neither discoverer seemed interested in its commercial use.  That would change in 1884 when, after Falhberg left Remsen’s lab and without notifying his co-discoverer, he applied for a German patent (which later transferred to an American patent) on a new method for cheaply producing greater quantities. By 1886, it was introduced to the public through a company he started the world’s first saccharin factory known as the Fahlberg, List & Co.

Chandler's Saccharin Pellets

  He then likewise quickly returned to the U.S. and set up shop in New York City, where he opened America’s first factory. Patent medicine companies like Chandler’s Distributors of St. Louis, MO, distributed saccharin in the United States as early as 1888 (see photo, left).  “Don’t Miss Your Sugar” was advertising headline.
  

 "Concentrated sweetness in handy form.  One pellet equals one teaspoon of sugar. Dissolves instantly – No bitter after-taste; which is experienced from the user of cheaper, inferior brands. Prescribed by doctors for persons unable to use sugar, also for reducing purposes.  A non-fattening, non-nutritive sweetening agent."

  By 1901, Monsanto was founded by John Francis Queeny, a 30-year veteran of the pharmaceutical industry, who gave the company his wife’s maiden name.  Oddly enough, the company’s first product was saccharin (in 1902) despite his father-in-law being a wealthy financier of a sugar company based in St. Thomas - this became the first commercial production of saccharin in the United States.   During the periods 1903 to 1905, Monsanto’s entire saccharin output was shipped (and later sold) to the growing soft drink company in Georgia, called Coca-Cola.  Its use became widespread especially during World War I due to sugar shortages.

Monsanto-brand Saccharin

  As early as 1907, the USDA investigated saccharin for being contradictory to the Pure Food and Drug Act, which had been enacted during President Theodore Roosevelt’s administration.  Teddy Roosevelt (being a consumer of saccharin) opposed the investigation and was stated saying, “Anyone who says saccharin is injurious to health is an idiot” when people questioned its use as a sweetener.  By 1917, the U.S. government filed suit over the safety of saccharin. 

  The safety of this now world-famous Baltimore-based discovery has been studied and written in volumes of literature and research.  Interestingly enough, it was one of the co-founders himself (Ira Remsen was the Johns Hopkins University acting president) who was quoted by the Baltimore Sun as he lectured before the Public School Teacher’s Association on an evening in February 1890, “It may interest you to learn that saccharin was discovered about ten years ago in the chemical laboratory of the Johns Hopkins University, and that it is now manufactured on the large scale in Germany.  It is an open question whether its side effects upon the system are injurious or not.” 

Remsen Hall, Johns Hopkins
(Courtesy: JHU)

  Although it was possibly stated with vengeance over not being credited for its discovery within patent or public venues, perhaps this forewarning by the true co-inventor might be the best input in determining your own opinion about its safeness

  Here in Baltimore, after his death in 1927, Dr. Ira Remsen’s ashes were placed behind a plaque in Remsen Hall on the Homewood Campus of saccharin’s discovery location at Johns Hopkins University.  Dr. Constantine Fahlberg died in Aug 1910 and is buried at Novodevichy Cemetery, Moscow, Russia.

(Other Sources for this blogpost courtesy of: Chemical Heritage Magazine, Wikipedia, and Baltimore Sun articles)

The Lasting Products Company - Baltimore City's "Little Castles"

The Lasting Products Company ad, circa 1946

Until 1937, downtown Baltimore City homes looked like many other homes within urban landscapes across America - concrete or brick-faced or even slated wood - but U.S. Patent Number 2,095,641 would change all that.  Lewis Albert Knight (he went by "Albert") had a vision which eventually transformed the traditional row home-lined Baltimore City street only to become a distinctive part of its unique heritage. Mr. Knight graduated from Franklin High School in Reisterstown, studied at the Maryland Institute, and eventually received his bachelor's degree from Johns Hopkins University.  He died in 1980 at the age of 76.

  On March 1, 1937, this Glyndon native filed his patent as an assignor to the Lasting Products Company where he was employed at the time - "A process of making artificial stone wall facings."  It was marketed to thousands of homeowners that it would "make your home the neighborhood showplace," "beautiful, long-lasting," and "maintenance free."

The FormStone Original, PlateMarker

  The parent firm of Formstone was the Lasting Products Company (see their ad, above), a paint manufacturing firm founded by Albert I. Rankin who was born in 1897 and immigrated to Baltimore as a young boy.  He began manufacturing paint, roof coatings, and putty at 200-212 S. Franklintown Rd, Baltimore, MD, the location of the company until it sold out in 1974, seven years after he died.

  Simulated stone was found in other cities, and while the Formstone patent expired 17 years later, it went by a multitude of other brands such as "Perma-stone," "Dixie Stone,""Rostone," "Silverstone," TruStone,""Bermuda Stone,"Modern Stone," "Romanstone," "Magnolia Stone," "Fieldstone," or "Stone of Ages."  It was the rage throughout the 40s, 50s, and 60s, given that homeowners seemed to love it as it covered up brick and other masonry imperfections, helped modernize home appearances, and was advertised to be near maintenance-free. Those who dreaded the idea of repeated, exterior wall painting, saw hope in the concept.

"Little Castles" Rowhomes in Baltimore
(Photo: Courtesy, theatlanticcity.com)

  Formstone and Permastone were similar in that they were created at the job site, much like interior plaster.   Decades later, there were surprises for homeowners and a nightmare for preservationists since its removal would often destroy the original detailing under the installation.  Mesh wiring was first applied to the exterior of the building, overlaid by a cement "scratch" coat.  Over that went a base coat followed by a color or textured material that was hand-sculptured on top - in Mr. Knight's case, rather than just coloring the stone mixture with pigment, he mixed colored stones from many parts of the country which enabled it to be color-resistant to outdoor elements.

  According to "Old House Journal, 1982," Formstone was not the only affront to be sprayed, rolled, poured, or smeared over original exteriors.  For instance, there was the "Merit Wall Method"which was marketed by Merit Enterprises.  A thick rubbery material was sprayed over everything but the window glass -- cornices, gutters, and door frames were not exempted. Suspended in goo was fine stone dust and the effect was that of a huge metalflake balloon having been stretched over the house and then cut out at the doors and windows."  Fortunately, it never caught on to the extent of Formstone.

  Native son and avant-garde film director, John Waters, affectionately referred to it as the "Polyester of Brick" and went so far as to document it in one entitled "Little Castles: A Formstone Phenomenon."  Due to its prolific use in over 50 percent of Baltimore row homes, preservationists to this day debate over what is worthy of preservation - the pre-faux or the post-faux look. The idea of preserving Formstone in Baltimore has been creeping into the modernist mentality, while others have decided that tradition is what lies beneath.  A Baltimore Sun article, December 1, 2012, states that the Baltimore City Council seems to be of the impression that it is a rather tacky appearance and needs to henceforth be banned from further proliferation and use.  What opinion do you have, hon?